|
|
Summary:
Multiple Flaws in Noted Abstinence Education Evaluation
Despite results found in study, abstinence education does work in
helping teenagers to delay sex until marriage.
-
According to an article on
www.zenit.org, Mathematica Policy
Research, Inc. (a public policy research firm) claimed that a study
they had conducted showed that abstinence education programs are not
effective. However, Jason Evert, an international chastity speaker,
author, and full-time apologist for Catholic Answers, disagreed with
the methods and findings of the study. In particular, he found six
major flaws in their study. The first flaw was that the students
used in the study were between the ages of 9 and 11 years old, which
is not an age at which young people generally understand the
relevance of an abstinence message; second, the study had no high
school component and the students had no follow-up to the program
during the teenage years (when they would have needed it the most);
third, Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. did not evaluate a
comparable education program in order to compare their findings;
fourth, the majority of the students used for their study were
already considered high risk for early sexual activity because they
were from broken families, therefore, their behaviors are not
representative of most young people; fifth, the sample of the
schools studied represented less than 1% of the more than 900
abstinence programs that receive federal funding; and sixth, the
abstinence programs that were studied have already been revised and
updated and the conclusions that have been drawn from them are
outdated. Based on these findings it has become obvious to Jason
Evert and many others that the Mathematica study was mainly
conducted in attempts to influence congressional leaders to restrict
the amount of funding given to abstinence education. The positive
aspect of this study is that is shows how desperate the opponents of
abstinence education have become. According to this article, if the
$6 million research conducted by Mathematica Policy Research is the
best case against the effectiveness of abstinence education, their
case is clearly weak. More than 30 scientific evaluations have shown
that abstinence education reduced sexual activity and has a positive
effect on teens. In fact, the National Longitudinal Study of
Adolescent Health found that girls who take virginity pledges are
40% less likely to have a child out-of-wedlock than young women who
do not make such a pledge. Furthermore, the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention have reported that teen sexual activity rates
have been dropping since 1991, and now the majority of high school
students are remaining virgins. In fact, between 1991 and 2005 the
sexual activity rate of high school boys dropped twice as quickly as
that of high school girls. The increase in abstinence education has
played a major role in this new sexual evolution.1
1What
Abstinence Education Gets Right: Interview with Chastity Speaker
Jason Evert, Innovative Media Inc., July 12, 2007, pp. 1-4.
Send Page To a Friend
|
|